
On "Campground Music"
and Playing Tunes A Real Long Time
Here is the first rambling "musing" of more to come about my candidate new genre name for the long-winded, improvisatory version of old-time music I associate with Clifftopcall it campground!
I wouldn't give a fig for the simplicity on this side of complexity; I would give my right arm for the simplicity on the far side of complexity.
From: The Autocrat of the Breakfast Table (1858): He must be a poor creature that does not often repeat himself. Imagine the author of the excellent piece of advice, "Know thyself," never alluding to that sentiment again during the course of a protracted existence! Why, the truths a man carries about with him are his tools; and do you think a carpenter is bound to use the same plane but once to smooth a knotty board with, or to hang up his hammer after it has driven its first nail? I shall never repeat a conversation, but an idea often. I shall use the same types when I like, but not commonly the same stereotypes. A thought is often original, though you have uttered it a hundred times. It has come to you over a new route, by a new and express train of associations.
Notes from Hogie Siebert
Hogie was the inspiration behind "Hogie in the Midst" on Clifftop Notes Vol. 1. When I finally tracked her down to ask her about her recollection of the night the tune was written (actually for a while the title of the tune was actually "That Night at Clifftop with Hogie" and it was in A, in AEAE tuning), this is what she had to say:
Hogie writes: I had a new freedom because there was absolutely nothing intentional about what I played that night. I was letting the banjo lead the way. Ive never played like that since, because of course I always have some idea of what to do or how a tune goes and neither of those kinds of info were available to me that night since you were making up tunes and I was new to the fretless I decided that the only way I could approach playing the fretless for the first time would be to unhinge my mind...
On "Campground Music"
and Playing Tunes A Real Long TimeFrom the FIDDLE-L Newsgroup ("Fiddle Players' Discussion List" <FIDDLE-L@listserv.brown.edu>)
OK - the context...
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:19:28 -0500
> From: Joe Cline <kilocycles@carolina.rr.com>
> Shawn sez:
>
>> As
>> far as playing tunes 20 times through, I've been in "old time" jams where
>> this takes place and I usually leave those jams.
>
>> Joe wrote:
> I'll agree with that, and add that the old-time sessions that indulge in
> such shenanigans are usually made up of "revivalists" rather than
> musicians
> native to the tradition; "natives," unless they're playing for dancing,
> usually play a tune five or six times, and then move on to another tune.
>
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:15:07 -0800
>
> From: johnmary <johnmary@charter.net>
>> How freakin' rude! yet another biased division in the "old time" scene.
So - to intercept a little spat a-brewing and turn it into a more interesting conversation (for me at least!): I have a funny story, some questions, an information request, and a theory about playing tunes a long time in jam sessions, especially in the context of old-time music.
Funny Story: Departing Clifftop a few years ago, catching a ride with Elizabeth and Tom Pittman (the latter of the Austin Lounge Lizards), Tom (who had just survived a week-long full immersion in the hard-core old-time scene) said: "One thing still puzzles me... It seems like people sit around and play the same time 20 or 30 times. How do they know when they're done?" Elizabeth: "Well, see, honey--when they're done the fiddler lifts his foot." Tom: "Right - but how does the fiddler know when it's time to lift their foot?"
Questions: Because our available recordings of old-time music performances may typically involve renditions of about 5-6 times through a tune isn't direct evidence of what the practice might have been in a variety of other musical settings. Commercial recordings, field recordings, and other settings where there was awareness of the recording being made, as well as settings like contests and competitions, would all have the potential of changing the practice followed in other social settings. Further, the telling phrase "unless they're playing for dancing" casually tosses off what surely was one of the most prevalent performance settings for old-time music, when playing for legendarily long periods of time has certainly been noted. On the other hand, we sometimes forget that solo playing, and particular playing FOR NO AUDIENCE, has always been an important part of the tradition, along with the social aspect. How long did a fiddler play a tune when sitting alone on his or her front porch of an evening?
Also, curiously, in other contexts "revivalism" has been associated with the exact opposite trend. A friend of mine who was a trained folklorist studying village dances of what was then still Yugoslavia (that tells you how long ago this was!) once told me the following: She had learned dozens of dances in the international folk dance scene, where dances were done for a few minutes (while the record played). But when she went to do field work and danced with villagers, she discovered they would typically do one simple dance for 30-40 minutes or more. She said that only after seemingly endless repetitions of the familiar dance moves did she begin to understand what the dance was really about. (Of course, even so her experience as an outsider would still have been no doubt different from the "natives." But the natives certainly did do the dances for a very long time.)
Request: I would be very interested in hearing from people on the list about their _direct_ experiences, or documentary evidence about, performance practice and attitudes on this question among the older generation of players. Please try to avoid speculation, hearsay and fisticuffs, however!
Theory: Regardless of whether playing tunes for a very long time was part of "native" (whatever that means!) practice in old-time music, (and regardless of whether you like playing in or listening to such sessions yourself), we can certainly agree that in certain musical settings today this has become a performance practice. Some of this is no doubt bad, boring music, festival mosh-pit fiddling, or music to help beginners learn a tune through multiple repetitions. But I also believe that in the midst of these long late-night jams there are some interesting and new musical things happening. Curiously, I've seen some of the strongest young players coming out of the bluegrass and "fiddle camp" scenes responding with enthusiasm to this jamming aesthetic, though it is the polar opposite of the disciplined "round of solos" format of bluegrass. I actually don't really care whether this is "traditional old time music" or not, though I am curious as to how it might compare to what the old-timers did in various circumstances (see my question above). But if what is happening is good music--to play, to listen to, to dance to--then it is worthy of respect and interest in its own right. To avoid such debates about traditionality, I propose a new genre term for this extended-form tune playing. I call it Campground. Now all you have to decide is if you like it!
All content ©2006 Mark Simos/Devachan Music. All Rights Reserved.